"upper requirements democratic decision-making"
The sino-french war ended, the beats to the expectations zte confrontations intelligentsia brought infinite regret. Especially the end of the war that few games of chance, cannot reproduce NaGuan victories (for example), let the victory in the glory of the resurgence twinkling, natural is aggravating this loss. So, the war finally got a "French winless and winning, MBT Fumba. China unbeaten and losing evaluation.
But the highest decision-making is timely and wise that elected in the present situation of both sides, method of did able to support the claim. However, Korean, wild two levels of war criticism and reflection, still give empire brought irreversible great change.
For those who cannot access to the war in the core of the intellectuals decision-making insider concerned, "French winless and winning, China unbeaten and losing snyder paradox, the humiliation of blame for only mbt shoes uk the corruption. After some years, sun yat-sen in the founding of traces their strategies to revolutionary road so the starting point: "YiYou sino-french defeat in the beginning, create roc should overthrow the log. "YiYou", namely in 1885, that year, sun yat-sen 20.
System of intelligentsia apparently see more than the sun - if not clear throughout "war, and imperial condemn", this war is this not tied so miserably innings. But the court was long-term "war, and condemn", but are in the two highest decision-making between the three busy at fight and a human rights to win a human rights in national war to fight chips.
By comparing the governor ZhangShuSheng and his huai army, MBT Kisumu,it was during the war, and became the court battle condemn victim. Deathbed, zhang tried to appeal court house, actual listener open - zhang trying to house system to replace the existing top decision-making system, should they "democracy" in house of government, rather than one, two people "dictatorship" concerning administration in deep palace, can avoid the tragedy of fujian navy division in lordaeron to repeat itself.
And ZhangShuSheng hold the same opinion system of intellectuals is very much. For example: ShangShouQian advice do "upper" and "lower house", the former composed by senior bureaucrats in Beijing, the latter in Beijing by bureaucrats who have composed immigrants-and suppressed, upper and lower houses, supplies ideas to make decision that finally by prime minister "emperor of discussion, please such as line"; ChenQiu is in favor of DouChaYuan, matriculating setting a senator by the central ministries, 36 people about MBT Kisumu2,this institution presses, and state... Such.
As above (the 1884: by comparing the governor of open house last request the court said, ZhangShuSheng) had lifted the opinion of the court opening parliament request with western honor moisture, the civil rights as the core of the parliamentary system is not the same. System of intellectual trying to copy the western parliamentary form to compensate for the empire dictatorship decision-making system's ills, although just climb a tree to look for fish, but as long as "beg fish" persist, "fish" will eventually come; System of decision-making MBT Salama,of "democracy" appeal, will eventually spread to system besides.
No comments:
Post a Comment